Valkyria chronicles operation cloudburst

#VALKYRIA CHRONICLES OPERATION CLOUDBURST PLUS#

It's what gave them most of their best equipment in WWII, kept up their armor and missile developments, and saved their submarines from becoming obsolete. They developed their own, and shelved the project, reviving it only after Israeli Blazer armor proved extremely effective in Lebanon.Д¤) The Russians are known to be exceptional at acquiring technology, reverse-engineering it, and improving it. Heck, they probably wouldn't even be using using their landmark ERA at all if not for western developments. Pictures speak louder than words.ДЈ) Western developments are quite important to the Russians. It's more along the lines of the Russians would have to be either crazy or stupid not to incorporate those features on ALL future designs.Дў) The T-64 uses ERA too. Similarly, while the T-90 incorporates some things the T-80 had, it is nowhere near being a development of it. It is not part of the T-55/62/72/90 lineage.

That has always been the case, or at least since WWII.ДЎ) The T-80 is a derivative of the T-64, which was derived from a parallel development to the T-55 and T-62, and a completely new design. Generally Russian designs aren't affected by western ones.ДЄnd even if Russians did copy some elements, which is extremely unlikely, they certainly were unable to improve them or even retain the original quality of those elements. All those models (except 64, 90 has it by standard) have ERA as well (explosive reactive armor, those brick-like things on its armour) so yeah.

#VALKYRIA CHRONICLES OPERATION CLOUDBURST PLUS#

The main difference between all those models is the tower and weaponry plus electronics. T-90 is a T-64 modification, just like T-72, T-80 and every Russian or Ukrainian design in between. Me think is T-90 was T-80 with Leopard tank design. The PPSh-41 submachine gun for example, arguably the best such weapon in WWII, was the result of mating a Finnish magazine and feed mechanism with a German firing one. More often than not, Soviet advances were based on copying, and maybe improving, foreign technologies and designs. Of course, this is a standard method of Soviet R&D. So, if you trace it back, the T-90 is actually descended from an American design :p The BT-7 was the third production variant of the BT-2, which was basically a copy of the US-designed Christie M1931.Д«ut furthermore, the T-54/55 was a development of the T-34, and with the exception of the T-64 and T-80, all future Soviet/Russian tanks were derived from that. It's origins are one of the reasons it's pretty much the fastest medium tank of the war - the BT was the fastest light tank.

The T-34 was an enlarged BT-7 chassis incorporating a heavier gun and sloped armor. The T-34 was an American design that was sold to the Soviets and in the end built the, but smaller M3 Shermans.

Valkyria chronicles operation cloudburst